Court rejects appeal to change preventive measure for UOJ journalist

Representatives of the SBU serve suspicion to UOJ journalist. Photo: t.me/SBUkr

On April 8, 2024, a court hearing took place regarding the appeal against the preventive measure for detained UOJ journalist Valeriy Stupnitsky.

According to video materials available to the UOJ, Valeriy Stupnitsky was not brought to the courtroom, which constitutes a gross violation of Ukrainian legislation.

Stupnitsky's lawyer informed the court that the detained journalist has serious health problems, including ischemic heart disease, and the conditions of his detention in pre-trial detention do not even meet minimum standards.

For example, Stupnitsky is held in a cell where the number of detainees exceeds the number of beds they can sleep on. Therefore, the UOJ journalist has to sleep for only 4 hours a day, mainly during the daytime. As a result, he has lost consciousness several times.

Additionally, the lawyer pointed out that the accusations against V. Stupnitsky lack evidentiary basis and cannot be used as evidence of his guilt.

In particular, he is charged with expressing the opinion that people seizing UOC churches are raiders. The prosecution believes that using the word "raiders" in relation to these people incites religious enmity. This is despite the fact that Ukrainian legislation uses this term in relation to illegal seizures of buildings or territories, and criminal cases are opened against those who seize UOC churches.

After the lawyer pointed out that Valeriy Stupnitsky has three children and did not evade the court, the suspect was given the floor via internet connection.

A standard television set was installed in the courtroom without additional sound amplifying equipment. As a result, when Valeriy Stupnitsky connected, almost nothing he said was audible in the courtroom.

Furthermore, Stupnitsky himself, as the defendant, had no opportunity to participate in the court hearing, respond to the accusations, request the court for explanations, and so on, which is illegal.

As a result, the court rejected the lawyer's motion and left Valeriy Stupnitsky in the pre-trial detention center.

Earlier, the UOJ wrote about the charges against Orthodox journalists.

Read also

Orthodox and Catholic bishops make joint visit to Mount Athos

The head of the Phanar blessed a joint pilgrimage to Mount Athos by Roman Catholic and Orthodox bishops.

UOC Kryvyi Rih Eparchy marks 30th anniversary

Metropolitan Yefrem led the anniversary Divine Liturgy in Kryvyi Rih.

Ostapenko: Everyone in UCCRO feels fine except the “FSB UOC”

The director of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra National Reserve called the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches “a wonderful organization.”

Khmelnytskyi Eparchy donates funds for treatment of 12-year-old girl

UOC believers raised UAH 20,000 for Anastasiia Mamchur as part of an eparchial charity campaign.

Shevchuk: We had to convince world UOC ban does not violate religious freedom

The UGCC head claims that by banning the UOC, the state is not violating religious freedom but merely protecting the Church’s faithful from Moscow propaganda.

Lavra reserve head estimates damage to Dormition Cathedral at €15 million

Maksym Ostapenko said restoring the Dormition Cathedral would take at least a couple of years and require major funding.