Orthodox and Jews: Who’s at home and who’s a guest
Menorah on Maidan. Photo: Focus
Chilly’s post is being widely discussed on social media, and Israel has even called on Ukraine to act "decisively against those inciting hatred and breaking the law," including on social media.
A centralized anti-crisis PR campaign is being rolled out across various platforms, showcasing the arguments used in this discussion. For example, a segment on the TV channel "1+1" featured interviews with several public figures outraged by Chilly’s post.
MP Vasylenko-Smahliuk stated that the Constitution guarantees everyone freedom of religion and the right to perform religious rituals. Expert Ihor Koshil argued that Ukrainians dissatisfied with menorahs are anti-Semites because "they are not ready to accept people who are different." Ukraine's Chief Rabbi Moshe Reuven Azman, speaking bluntly in Russian, claimed that anyone opposing the menorah in central Kyiv is "working for Russian propaganda."
Why are we writing about this? After all, Jews, like any other religious group, have the right to express their religious feelings as they see fit. However, it’s interesting to draw a parallel with the situation surrounding the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC).
Imagine for a moment that the president announced the need for spiritual independence for Ukraine’s Jews (perhaps because Russia’s Chief Rabbi meets with Putin and doesn’t condemn the "special military operation"). Imagine certain individuals began re-registering Jewish communities under the authority of other religious groups, storming synagogues, and spraying gas, breaking arms, legs, and jaws of Jews defending their sanctuaries. And instead of defending them, the authorities adopted a law banning Jews in Ukraine. Can you imagine that?
Unlikely. Such a scenario in Ukraine is impossible. Why is that?
Why does MP Vasylenko-Smahliuk, a Jewish woman, invoke the Constitution in defense of the menorah on Maidan but forgets about the Constitution when voting to ban the UOC? Why do journalists on "1+1," when commenting on the persecution of Orthodox Christians, not say that society "is not ready to accept those who are different," and instead encourage the harassment? Why don’t they point out that the persecution of the UOC benefits Russian propaganda?
There is nothing wrong with the authorities protecting and supporting Jews and ensuring they feel at home in Ukraine. The problem is that Orthodox Ukrainians are being made to feel as though they are merely guests in their own country.
Read also
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.