Are Greeks opening their Patriarch’s eyes to Ukraine?
Mount Athos. Photo: Turnavigator
1. The text is signed by abbots and monastics who are under the jurisdiction of the Phanar and Greece – Churches that have recognised the OCU. Formally, they should not even admit the existence of the UOC, since Patriarch Bartholomew does not recognise it. Nevertheless, they refer to it not as a collection of “eparchies of the Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine” (as the head of the Phanar does) but the Ukrainian Orthodox Church under Metropolitan Onuphry, who is followed by the vast majority of Ukrainian Orthodox Christians (about 24 million).”
2. The UOC is the true Church of Christ because it is undergoing persecution: “Persecution is a sign of the authenticity of Christian life.”
3. They refer to the OCU as the “so-called” Church and note the collaboration of its members with bandits who are seizing UOC churches.
4. The signatories condemn the Ukrainian authorities, who are trying to outlaw the UOC, calling them a state “in the times of Hitler and Stalin”.
5. The text provides details of the seizure of the cathedral in Cherkasy. This shows that Greece and Mount Athos are following the situation in Ukraine closely. And if they know about Cherkasy, they are aware of many other similar cases.
6. The Greeks quote Patriarch Bartholomew’s words about the inadmissibility of violence in churches, specifically in the context of the Church of St. Dionysius in Athens.
And here it is appropriate to recall one of the decisions of the 2018 Synod, by which the Phanar legitimised Filaret, Macarius and their followers: ‘To appeal to all parties involved to refrain from seizing churches, monasteries and other property, as well as from any other violent actions.’
In other words, Patriarch Bartholomew feared that seizures and violence would occur in Ukraine. And if a person fears something, at the very least, they keep an eye on the situation to take action if there are excesses.
All this time, while violence has been directed at the believers of the UOC, the head of the Phanar has remained silent. Let’s even assume that he truly did not know about it. But now, pretending not to see is impossible – his own clerics are opening Patriarch Bartholomew’s eyes.
Will he take steps to correct what he has wrought?
Read also
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.