On denunciations to "authorities" about UOC Diaspora
UOC clergy abroad. Photo: DECR UOC website
Currently, thousands of churches in Ukraine have been seized, and tomorrow, the same could happen to any remaining active church. The only way we can be 100% certain of attending a service next Sunday is by being outside Ukraine. However, in recent times, the UOC diaspora (which now comprises around 100 churches) has come under media attacks from our "Christian brothers" in the UGCC and OCU. Two statements have emerged almost simultaneously: one from the head of the Uniates, Shevchuk, and the other from OCU cleric Kovalenko. Their message is nearly identical – Ukrainian authorities must do everything possible to ensure that UOC parishes do not exist, not only within the country but also beyond its borders.
The arguments presented are outright lies (not even manipulations):
- That these communities are established under Moscow’s orders and financed by it.
- That they promote the concept of the "Russian World".
- That UOC communities train spies and provocateurs to create unrest in Ukraine.
The conclusion drawn by these "Christian brothers" is clear – they are calling on Ukraine’s "relevant authorities" to take action. Simply put, to ban and eliminate UOC communities, as has nearly been achieved at home.
At the same time, both speakers are fully aware that they are spreading falsehoods, that the UOC diaspora has no ties to Moscow. Moreover, the ROC itself is not pleased with its emergence. The reason behind these statements is simple – both the UGCC and the OCU seek to "privatize" all emigrants (even though the OCU is prohibited from doing so by the Tomos issued by Pat. Partholomew).
During the Soviet era, some pragmatic citizens living in communal apartments would snitch on their neighbors to the authorities in hopes of acquiring their living 'square meters' after their arrest.
As the saying goes, nothing personal.
And nothing Christian.
Read also
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.