May 17 marks one year since the demolition of Tithe Monastery
The demolition of the Tithe Monastery in 2024. Photo: Babel
Equal-to-the-Apostles Volodymyr and Olga of the Tithe Monastery of the Nativity of the Most Holy Theotokos in Kyiv. The destruction of the holy site occurred during the night of May 16-17, 2024.
The UOJ recalls how events unfolded.
On the evening of May 16, around 10:30 PM, security forces arrived at the monastery, cordoned off the temple, and did not allow either the monks or the faithful to approach it. Soon, heavy machinery – bulldozers and trucks – arrived, and the destruction of the Orthodox shrine began.
By 12:20 AM on May 17, the temple's debris was already being transported away on trucks. According to the monastery, during the demolition, the altar with relics, icons, crosses, and other sacred items were in the temple, and they were removed as "construction debris".
It is especially cynical that the demolition took place during the curfew and without any documents being entered into the registry of enforcement proceedings, indicating a violation of legal norms.
In connection with the anniversary of this event, Bishop Clement of Borova, vicar of the Kyiv Metropolis and abbot of the Tithe Monastery, gave a speech in which he emphasized the spiritual significance of the destroyed shrine: “This temple was not only an architectural adornment but also a symbol of spiritual heritage, inextricably linked to the beginning of the Christian history of Rus.”
In his address, Bishop Clement particularly noted the pain caused by the actions of the destroyers: “Those who demolished our temple said it was an 'illegal building'. But who gave them the right to destroy what was founded on the faith and prayers of the people? I do not write these words with offence – I write them with pain. Not for the temple made of wood and stone, but for the human hearts in which the fear of God has faded.”
The bishop reminded of the warning of the Apostle Paul: “If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy him; for God’s temple is holy, and you are that temple” (1 Cor. 3:17). “Yes, the apostle speaks of man as the temple of the Holy Spirit. But how can someone, in whom God lives, destroy temples consecrated for prayer? To raise a hand against God’s house, one must first destroy the temple within their own soul,” emphasized the bishop.
Bishop Clement recalled that the temple was built on the land sanctified by the blood of the first martyrs – the holy passion-bearers Theodore and his son, the infant John, and was consecrated by His Beatitude Metropolitan Volodymyr, and after the fire, by His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry.
“We may be dispersed, the building may be demolished, but the Church of Christ cannot be destroyed – and the gates of hell will not prevail against it,” concluded Bishop Clement, expressing hope that in the future, a new cathedral will arise in the place of the destroyed temple.
Earlier, the UOJ reported that there is now only trash and weeds on the site of the monastery's demolition.
Read also
Ostapenko: Everyone in UCCRO feels fine except the “FSB UOC”
The director of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra National Reserve called the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches “a wonderful organization.”
Khmelnytskyi Eparchy donates funds for treatment of 12-year-old girl
UOC believers raised UAH 20,000 for Anastasiia Mamchur as part of an eparchial charity campaign.
Shevchuk: We had to convince world UOC ban does not violate religious freedom
The UGCC head claims that by banning the UOC, the state is not violating religious freedom but merely protecting the Church’s faithful from Moscow propaganda.
Lavra reserve head estimates damage to Dormition Cathedral at €15 million
Maksym Ostapenko said restoring the Dormition Cathedral would take at least a couple of years and require major funding.
DESS official says state should not govern the Church
A DESS official called for cooperation between the state and the Church for the benefit of citizens.
Poltava court upholds mobilization of Protestant pastor
A court in the Poltava region ruled that a prior criminal conviction and religious beliefs do not exempt a person from military service.