OSCE expert: Govt “directives” toward UOC have effectively become repressive

UOC moleben on Volodymyrska Hill on the Day of the Baptism of Rus’ – 2018. Photo: UOJ

Religious scholar and OSCE expert on freedom of religion Natallia Vasylevych commented on the “directives” issued by the State Service for Ethnopolitics and Freedom of Conscience (DESS) requiring the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) to eliminate alleged “ties” with Moscow.

According to the expert, “at this point, the level of escalation in relations between the UOC and the state apparatus has reached such a degree that any document titled ‘directive,’ especially when accompanied by a threat of liquidation in case of noncompliance, automatically becomes a repressive measure.” Vasylevych noted that it is particularly revealing that such a directive was addressed to “the Metropolitan of Kyiv – just a week after he was stripped of his Ukrainian citizenship for exhibiting so-called ‘signs of affiliation’ with Russia.”

The OSCE expert described the government’s policy over the past three years as a system of coercion: “We’ll show you how bad things can get if you don’t comply with our terms, and then offer a list of actions which, if carried out, will make us stop treating you badly.” As a result of this approach, “the specific terms hardly matter anymore – even if the conditions were things the UOC leadership had always dreamed of implementing, they become unfulfillable in principle – ‘principally unfulfillable,’” Vasylevych stressed.

In her assessment, these are “no longer relations between equal partners who respect each other and act reasonably toward one another.” Instead, “distortions and projections prevail,” making constructive engagement impossible.

Vasylevych warned that “instead of the hoped-for de-escalation, a new wave of escalation should be expected.” Among the factors contributing to the aggravation of the situation, she cited overall war fatigue in society, growing dissatisfaction with government bodies and wartime policies, the attitude of the OCU toward the UOC, and the resolution of church-related conflicts “through violence.”

“In the current context, which was designed specifically to apply pressure in order to force compliance, even something objectively achievable becomes unachievable,” the OSCE expert concluded. In her view, “the main problem is not the conditions themselves, but the need to change the context in which they are imposed.”

Earlier, UOJ reported that DESS ordered the Kyiv Metropolia to eliminate “violations” by August 18.

Read also

Ostapenko: Everyone in UCCRO feels fine except the “FSB UOC”

The director of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra National Reserve called the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches “a wonderful organization.”

Khmelnytskyi Eparchy donates funds for treatment of 12-year-old girl

UOC believers raised UAH 20,000 for Anastasiia Mamchur as part of an eparchial charity campaign.

Shevchuk: We had to convince world UOC ban does not violate religious freedom

The UGCC head claims that by banning the UOC, the state is not violating religious freedom but merely protecting the Church’s faithful from Moscow propaganda.

Lavra reserve head estimates damage to Dormition Cathedral at €15 million

Maksym Ostapenko said restoring the Dormition Cathedral would take at least a couple of years and require major funding.

DESS official says state should not govern the Church

A DESS official called for cooperation between the state and the Church for the benefit of citizens.

Poltava court upholds mobilization of Protestant pastor

A court in the Poltava region ruled that a prior criminal conviction and religious beliefs do not exempt a person from military service.