Prayer for Zelensky
Dumenko in the Verkhovna Rada. Photo: OCU
Dumenko read a prayer for Ukraine from the rostrum of the Verkhovna Rada. As usual, from a sheet of paper. It contained the following words:
“Strengthen our warriors, the president, the Verkhovna Rada, the authorities, the government, and all our Ukrainian people, who are resisting the treacherous Russian aggressor on land, at sea, and in the air. Grant us victory in Thy name and establish a just peace.”
Why are we writing about this? Because the entire “prayer” rhetoric of today’s patriotic confessions, in its pathos, is becoming more and more caricature-like and is sliding into frankly grotesque forms.
How do we pray for our country in the Church services? “For its authorities and armed forces.” That is enough. We do not spell things out to God: help the missile troops separately, or the Ministry of Economy, or the Committee on Humanitarian Policy. God is the Knower of hearts. He knows all our thoughts before they are even spoken.
But if a “metropolitan” composes, for a trip to the Rada, a prayer in which the president is listed separately, the Rada separately, the government separately, then we understand – these words are not addressed to God at all, but to the people who invited him into the Rada: Zelensky, Stefanchuk, the MPs, and so on.
And one more thing. Is it really necessary, in a prayer, to tell God that the aggressor is “treacherous”? That we are asking for help “on land, at sea, and in the air”? That our defenders are “courageous,” while the aggressor’s designs are “devilish”? One would think Christ knows far better than we do where the struggle is taking place, and who is treacherous and who is brave. And Serhiy Dumenko cannot fail to understand this. Yet he says it anyway. Why?
Because that is what they want to hear in the hall. That is the language normally used from the parliamentary rostrum. If you remove Dumenko’s final “amen” from the text, you are left with a typical speech by the average MP, complete with “a just peace,” “the treacherous Russian aggressor,” and other political clichés.
Still, one has to admit: speeches from the Rada’s rostrum are usually delivered with more inspiration. In acting skills, Epifaniy is clearly outmatched by the politicians.
Read also
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.