Mobilization of priests is real genocide, says Metropolitan Theodosiy
Metropolitan Theodosiy. Photo: Cherkasy Eparchy
On March 6, 2026, outside Kyiv’s Sviatoshyn District Court, Metropolitan Theodosiy of Cherkasy and Kaniv addressed the faithful and sharply criticized the authorities’ policy of mobilizing UOC clergy.
The hierarch recalled that, under a whole series of canonical rules of the Orthodox Church, a priest has no right not only to kill anyone, but even to take up arms or serve in the military. Despite this, clergy continue to be forcibly mobilized. As recent examples, he cited the cases of Fr. Yaroslav and Archimandrite Rafail from the theological academy.
Metropolitan Theodosiy then spoke in detail about how a clergyman should conduct himself under conditions of forced mobilization. In his view, the main thing is not to betray oneself – not to take off one’s cassock, not to conceal one’s priestly rank, and not to exchange one’s robe for a military uniform.
He warned against the temptation to “compromise one’s conscience” and rely on the promises of those who offer priests leniency in exchange for hiding their clerical status. According to him, such promises are deception, like a spider’s web.
“Every second a priest remains in the army after forced mobilization, so long as he is in his cassock, he remains under God’s protection,” the hierarch stressed.
At the same time, he pointed to representatives of other confessions – Baptists and Adventists – who are prepared to go to prison rather than betray the principles of their faith. “Are we, the Orthodox clergy, really to have no principles that are even more serious and well-grounded?” Metropolitan Theodosiy said.
In conclusion, he expressed hope that the crimes committed against the UOC – against its clergy, faithful, and episcopate – would receive a proper legal assessment. He referred to UN documents adopted after the Second World War, which define genocide on religious grounds.
According to the hierarch, responsibility should fall not only on the direct perpetrators, but also on those who passed laws banning the UOC, incited interreligious hatred, and members of the media who contributed to it.
“I am certain that the time will come when they will be held accountable for this. And if they do not manage to answer for it on this earth, then I have no doubt that before God, in eternity, that answer will still be given,” Metropolitan Theodosiy concluded.
Earlier, the UOJ reported that in Chernivtsi, military enlistment officers attempted to abduct a UOC bishop.
Read also
Ostapenko: Everyone in UCCRO feels fine except the “FSB UOC”
The director of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra National Reserve called the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches “a wonderful organization.”
Khmelnytskyi Eparchy donates funds for treatment of 12-year-old girl
UOC believers raised UAH 20,000 for Anastasiia Mamchur as part of an eparchial charity campaign.
Shevchuk: We had to convince world UOC ban does not violate religious freedom
The UGCC head claims that by banning the UOC, the state is not violating religious freedom but merely protecting the Church’s faithful from Moscow propaganda.
Lavra reserve head estimates damage to Dormition Cathedral at €15 million
Maksym Ostapenko said restoring the Dormition Cathedral would take at least a couple of years and require major funding.
DESS official says state should not govern the Church
A DESS official called for cooperation between the state and the Church for the benefit of citizens.
Poltava court upholds mobilization of Protestant pastor
A court in the Poltava region ruled that a prior criminal conviction and religious beliefs do not exempt a person from military service.