Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
Zelensky at the Lavra. Photo: Zelensky's press service
After a Russian drone struck the Dormition Cathedral, Zelensky promptly arrived at the Lavra and promised to restore the damaged church. He called what happened “barbarism” and “an open attack on the Christian community.”
And here, one cannot help but feel a certain bewilderment.
The Dormition Cathedral, like any other church, was built for prayer. From the point of view of the “Christian community,” it is no different from the most modest little church in some remote village. In both, the same Liturgy is served and the same Bloodless Sacrifice is offered.
Today, Zelensky and Ukraine’s leadership are making loud statements for an international audience and ostentatiously expressing grief over the “destruction of a shrine.” Yet just a couple of years ago, Zelensky just as ostentatiously remained silent when, under police protection, municipal workers demolished another shrine – the Tithes Monastery. Yes, that church did not have the same historical or architectural value as the Dormition Cathedral. But for any Christian, it was no less precious. And the Tithes Monastery was not an exception, but part of a system. Under Zelensky’s presidency, the UOC’s Transfiguration Church in Ivano-Frankivsk was demolished, as was St. Volodymyr’s Church in Lviv. Now the rector of the Transfiguration Church in Kyiv is sounding the alarm: his shrine, too, is facing the threat of destruction.
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the destruction of UOC churches by the Ukrainian authorities? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
In recent years, the churches of the Lavra have hosted rock concerts, cooking show shoots, performances by folk dance ensembles, government conferences, and other events that had nothing spiritual about them. For some reason, no one then said that the Lavra is a shrine, not a cultural center or a conference hall. Today, Zelensky suddenly remembered it. Why? It seems everyone knows the answer: because the Lavra is a Christian center known throughout the world. Because this topic can generate powerful hype.
Of course, attacks that destroy holy places are a crime. But that is what the enemy does. When churches were demolished by one’s own side, did that make it any easier for their parishioners?
Grief for export.
Read also
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.