The Lavra: Who is the master of the house?
A fashion show in the Refectory Church of the Lavra. Photo: KOVA
Another government event, “Dialogue on Resilience,” was held at the Refectory Church of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. Once again, a huge stage with screens was installed inside the church, covering the frescoes of the saints. Some women delivered grandiose speeches about “mental health” and the “philosophy of life.” The audience watched conceptual videos, while models paraded through the church showcasing new outfits.
All this was held under the patronage of Olena Zelenska, as part of her Summit of First Ladies and Gentlemen.
It should be recalled that the Refectory Church has previously hosted performances by song-and-dance ensembles, rock concerts, culinary show recordings, and other events.
In effect, after the expulsion of the UOC, the Lavra has become yet another venue for government and business events. Is there really any need for this? Perhaps Kyiv simply has no other locations where such events could be held?
Absolutely not. For instance, at the Mystetskyi Arsenal, located opposite the Lavra, dozens of similar events could be held simultaneously – it has an area of 50,000 square meters. And there is also the enormous Ukrainian House on Khreshchatyk, the National Palace of Arts “Ukraine,” the National Expocenter of Ukraine (VDNH), and dozens of other venues.
The authorities specifically need to hold events inside an Orthodox shrine. But why? What is the logic of our rulers? Probably the same as that of the OCU, which is taking churches away from the UOC at a time when its own churches are empty or half-empty.
And therein lies the entire essence of what is happening. This is not about a shortage of venues, nor about the "resilience" of Ukrainians, for the sake of which such forums are supposedly organized. This is about symbols. Neither the authorities nor the OCU actually need Orthodox churches. They need to show who is the master of the house.
Read also
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.